Do Human Instincts Explain What We Obtain, and Why We Want It?
Senin, 04 Juli 2011 by Android Blackberry
 |
| Do Human Instincts Explain |
Do Human Instincts Explain What We Obtain, and Why We Want It?
Everyone’s heard the bromide “think globally, act locally.” It exhorts folks to get involved in neighborhood causes, banking on the thought that tiny, individual acts will add up to big, international gains.
But what about the reverse - act globally, believe locally? When global ideas are tweaked for regional appeal, the activist slogan becomes additional than a plea to recycle your newspapers and acquire neighborhood lettuce. Ironically, it turns into a cipher for bang-on advertising campaigns. Universal desires are what motivate us, to be sure, but add some savvy about neighborhood tastes, and you will have a fairly superior concept of what people want.
Applying that mantra is how McDonald’s Corp. earned $6.1-billion the first quarter of 2011. Chicken McNuggets became Chicken Maharaja-Macs in India, and Mega-Teriyakis in Japan. Marketers knew that enjoying fried food is often a human universal. But how should it be spiced and sauced? Properly, these are just local glosses on a considerably larger theme.
In his new book, The Consuming Instinct: What Juicy Burgers, Ferraris, Pornography and Gift Giving Reveal about Human Nature, author Gad Saad shows how these consumer options are driven by four ancient and universal human desires: for survival in lean times (the appeal of fast food), for sexual reproduction (why sex sells), for favouring family members over others (the toy industry, by way of example), and for reciprocity among allies (gift-buying and giving). These 4 principles are what drive evolutionary alter, according to Saad, a professor of advertising and marketing at the John Molson School of Organization, at Concordia University, and they’re also the forces behind marketing and advertising that works.
“One of the major debates going on is whether or not you ought to you create 1 message and export it everywhere, or be sensitive to distinct expectations in unique settings,” said Prof. Saad, when I asked about advertising. “I argue that the key to solving this debate would be to infuse some evolutionary psychology into the discussion. You have to look at what are human universals, and what are local, biological adaptations.” For example, fried foods are well-known all over the globe because of our human ancestors who preferred high calorie meals when food sources were scarce. And since they survived, they had been able to pass on their high-fat preferring genes to modern day buyers like us.
But the seasoning in local dishes? Those are cultural variations determined partly by geography, and partly by happenstance, said Prof. Saad. “A neuroscientist at Cornell has identified that cross-cultural differences in salt and spices, and vegetables versus meat in the diet plan are all correlated using the number of food pathogens in the environment,” explained Prof. Saad, adding that there is still other varieties of preferences that have absolutely nothing to do with evolution. “Why are wedding dresses red in 1 culture and white in one more? That’s a cultural accident.”
A few of the universals described here make for entertaining reading. A low voice in men is such a effective magnet, based on Prof. Saad, that he bets Barack Obama wouldn’t have been elected had he had squeaky pipes like Ross Perot’s. “That’s what I call the Barry White effect,” he told me. “If you look at voice endorsers utilized to peddle products, expertise and understanding, companies use males with low voices because there’s an innate response we have [to that register] that transfers to the product. And in a variety of cultures, males who've deeper voices, on typical, have greater reproductive fitness.”
Translation? That means they’ll have a lot more success using the ladies, and will leave far more of their genes behind. And not just with any females, mind you, but stunning, healthy females, which brings us to a different human universal: what men obtain appealing, and what most women would like to invest in. “If I’m advertising beauty products, then regardless of whether I’m advertising in Namibia, Romania, or Canada, employing facial symmetry as a global cue to beauty will be the common metric.” Where nearby practices like scarring, or piercing are culture specific, there’s evidence showing that facial symmetry, which includes high even cheekbones for women and prominent jawbones for men, are innate cues that appeal to all persons - which includes infants - everywhere in the globe, says Prof. Saad. “What makes the Montrealer, the Peruvian and the Bedouin nomad have universal consumption patterns is their prevalent biological heritage, their shared consuming instinct,” he added.
In other words, what counts as the right sauce for your McChicken is one way of acting locally. But within the 117 countries it is on provide, “what defines that global village is our shared human nature, “ based on Prof. Saad. And that’s the most important reason why we invest in the item in the first place.
Susan Pinker can be a psychologist and author of The Sexual Paradox: Extreme Males, Gifted Females plus the Real Gender Gap.
Everyone’s heard the bromide “think globally, act locally.” It exhorts folks to get involved in neighborhood causes, banking on the thought that tiny, individual acts will add up to big, international gains.
But what about the reverse - act globally, believe locally? When global ideas are tweaked for regional appeal, the activist slogan becomes additional than a plea to recycle your newspapers and acquire neighborhood lettuce. Ironically, it turns into a cipher for bang-on advertising campaigns. Universal desires are what motivate us, to be sure, but add some savvy about neighborhood tastes, and you will have a fairly superior concept of what people want.
Applying that mantra is how McDonald’s Corp. earned $6.1-billion the first quarter of 2011. Chicken McNuggets became Chicken Maharaja-Macs in India, and Mega-Teriyakis in Japan. Marketers knew that enjoying fried food is often a human universal. But how should it be spiced and sauced? Properly, these are just local glosses on a considerably larger theme.
In his new book, The Consuming Instinct: What Juicy Burgers, Ferraris, Pornography and Gift Giving Reveal about Human Nature, author Gad Saad shows how these consumer options are driven by four ancient and universal human desires: for survival in lean times (the appeal of fast food), for sexual reproduction (why sex sells), for favouring family members over others (the toy industry, by way of example), and for reciprocity among allies (gift-buying and giving). These 4 principles are what drive evolutionary alter, according to Saad, a professor of advertising and marketing at the John Molson School of Organization, at Concordia University, and they’re also the forces behind marketing and advertising that works.
“One of the major debates going on is whether or not you ought to you create 1 message and export it everywhere, or be sensitive to distinct expectations in unique settings,” said Prof. Saad, when I asked about advertising. “I argue that the key to solving this debate would be to infuse some evolutionary psychology into the discussion. You have to look at what are human universals, and what are local, biological adaptations.” For example, fried foods are well-known all over the globe because of our human ancestors who preferred high calorie meals when food sources were scarce. And since they survived, they had been able to pass on their high-fat preferring genes to modern day buyers like us.
But the seasoning in local dishes? Those are cultural variations determined partly by geography, and partly by happenstance, said Prof. Saad. “A neuroscientist at Cornell has identified that cross-cultural differences in salt and spices, and vegetables versus meat in the diet plan are all correlated using the number of food pathogens in the environment,” explained Prof. Saad, adding that there is still other varieties of preferences that have absolutely nothing to do with evolution. “Why are wedding dresses red in 1 culture and white in one more? That’s a cultural accident.”
A few of the universals described here make for entertaining reading. A low voice in men is such a effective magnet, based on Prof. Saad, that he bets Barack Obama wouldn’t have been elected had he had squeaky pipes like Ross Perot’s. “That’s what I call the Barry White effect,” he told me. “If you look at voice endorsers utilized to peddle products, expertise and understanding, companies use males with low voices because there’s an innate response we have [to that register] that transfers to the product. And in a variety of cultures, males who've deeper voices, on typical, have greater reproductive fitness.”
Translation? That means they’ll have a lot more success using the ladies, and will leave far more of their genes behind. And not just with any females, mind you, but stunning, healthy females, which brings us to a different human universal: what men obtain appealing, and what most women would like to invest in. “If I’m advertising beauty products, then regardless of whether I’m advertising in Namibia, Romania, or Canada, employing facial symmetry as a global cue to beauty will be the common metric.” Where nearby practices like scarring, or piercing are culture specific, there’s evidence showing that facial symmetry, which includes high even cheekbones for women and prominent jawbones for men, are innate cues that appeal to all persons - which includes infants - everywhere in the globe, says Prof. Saad. “What makes the Montrealer, the Peruvian and the Bedouin nomad have universal consumption patterns is their prevalent biological heritage, their shared consuming instinct,” he added.
In other words, what counts as the right sauce for your McChicken is one way of acting locally. But within the 117 countries it is on provide, “what defines that global village is our shared human nature, “ based on Prof. Saad. And that’s the most important reason why we invest in the item in the first place.
Susan Pinker can be a psychologist and author of The Sexual Paradox: Extreme Males, Gifted Females plus the Real Gender Gap.
